Thursday, March 22, 2012

Deployment to Production problems

Somewhat newbie here trying to deploy my first Report. Production machine is
on Windows 2003 - finally got around the reporting service prompting for
windows authentication and now I'm trying to deploy my report through VS
2003. Which reports successful deployment.
If I press the "Run" button in VS 2003 it displays a web page:
[To Parent Directory]
Tuesday, March 29, 2005... Name of my report
No fancy Reporting Service front end, just a hyperlink. If I click on the
link, it displays my report.
If I navigate to http://[servername]/Reports/Pages/Folder.aspx it displays
the web page of SQL Server Reporting Services Home (with the appropriate
GUI), but no folders are listed.
There's obviously some extra step I need to do with 2003 that I didn't need
to setup on my local XP system that I developed and debugged on.Sounds like you haven't given permissions for anyone to see the reports. By
default, only admins can see contents of the server.
--
Brian Welcker
Group Program Manager
Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"dtaylor" <dtaylor@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:F158F5D6-E52B-40F6-9F31-31C49358C33D@.microsoft.com...
> Somewhat newbie here trying to deploy my first Report. Production machine
> is
> on Windows 2003 - finally got around the reporting service prompting for
> windows authentication and now I'm trying to deploy my report through VS
> 2003. Which reports successful deployment.
> If I press the "Run" button in VS 2003 it displays a web page:
> [To Parent Directory]
> Tuesday, March 29, 2005... Name of my report
> No fancy Reporting Service front end, just a hyperlink. If I click on the
> link, it displays my report.
> If I navigate to http://[servername]/Reports/Pages/Folder.aspx it displays
> the web page of SQL Server Reporting Services Home (with the appropriate
> GUI), but no folders are listed.
> There's obviously some extra step I need to do with 2003 that I didn't
> need
> to setup on my local XP system that I developed and debugged on.sql

No comments:

Post a Comment